🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.