🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I usually avoided significant use of randomization during my D&D sessions. My preference was for narrative flow and session development to be determined by player choice rather than pure luck. However, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known streamed game showcases a DM who regularly calls for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. This involves choosing a specific dice and assigning potential outcomes contingent on the result. It's fundamentally no distinct from rolling on a pre-generated chart, these get invented on the spot when a player's action lacks a predetermined conclusion.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, primarily because it seemed engaging and offered a departure from my usual habits. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the perennial dynamic between planning and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had concluded a massive conflict. Later, a player asked about two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Instead of picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, only one succumbed; a high roll, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a profoundly moving sequence where the party came upon the remains of their companions, still holding hands in death. The cleric performed a ceremony, which was especially powerful due to previous story developments. As a final reward, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously restored, containing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the item's magical effect was exactly what the party lacked to address another major situation. It's impossible to plan these kinds of perfect story beats.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This event caused me to question if randomization and making it up are actually the core of tabletop RPGs. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot need exercise. Players frequently excel at upending the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and create details in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these talents without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to apply them for low-stakes decisions that won't drastically alter the overarching story. For instance, I would avoid using it to decide if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. However, I could use it to figure out whether the party enter a room moments before a major incident takes place.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also helps make players feel invested and create the impression that the game world is dynamic, evolving based on their actions as they play. It combats the sense that they are merely characters in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the shared aspect of the game.

This approach has long been part of the game's DNA. Early editions were reliant on charts, which fit a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. While modern D&D tends to prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly no problem with thorough preparation. But, it's also fine no issue with stepping back and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Direction is a significant factor in a DM's responsibilities. We need it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, even when doing so might improve the game.

My final advice is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little chance for inconsequential details. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is far more memorable than anything you could have pre-written on your own.