🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."